Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Switching loss

I am getting this in order of hundreds of Watts. This doesn't sound right.

6 comments:

Yusuf said...

With the new 90A/us is lower than before but still int he high tens which gives efficiency <90%....I guess this is not a synchronous converter so lower efiicinecy is expected. Hope I am correct.

wrich said...

Hey Yusef, what approach did you use for the time interval tb? Did you integrate the product of i(t)*v(t)?

Anonymous said...

There are two intervals in the transistor:

The first interval you can treat it like the textbook example like you told me before (because Vg is constant across)

The second interval you treat with two linear functions. Find the equation of the line between these two pts: (0, 400V), (30ns, 0) for v(t). For the current, I assumed a straight line with points (0, -2.7A) and (30ns, 0)

The 2.7A is 90*30ns. Multiply those two functions to get a polynomial and integrate from 0 to 30ns.

Let me know if you agree.

Tanto said...

Hello All,

I just finished calculating the switching loss using new info and want to check if it's sound right.

Ploss_switch = 34.69 W,
Ploss_diode 1.08 W (during period tb only, assume linear i(t) and v(t) as yusuf suggested)
Conv Eff = 92.85%

Anonymous said...

Diode losses compare with mine.....the transistor losses are higher than mine. I got 23.4W.

Yusuf said...

Guys, I am getting much higher losses. ~69W for M and ~20W for D and eff ~85%. I think my method is correct but I'm sure I'm making a math error somewhere.

In the tb interval, I got linear equations for v(t) and i(t) for both D and M and and integrating the product of v(t) amd i(t) gave me the energy which I then multiplied by fs to get P. I mde one approximation, the product gives a quadratic inegral of which has cube and square terms which I ignored as they would be very small.